If with this shitty sentiment price is holding above $80k, that should be a first sign of strength.
In the post: “If with this shitty sentiment price is holding above $80k, that should be a first sign of strength.”
ITelegram · @CryptoCapoTG · 116K subscribers · ~24K views a post
Anonymous crypto trader known on X as @CryptoCapo_. This is his official free Telegram channel.
The call comes from the author's Telegram post (with an exact quote) and is checked 24 hours after it is published.
If with this shitty sentiment price is holding above $80k, that should be a first sign of strength.
In the post: “If with this shitty sentiment price is holding above $80k, that should be a first sign of strength.”
GM I think if $BTC reclaims $82k, 'up only' officially starts for some days.
In the post: “I think if $BTC reclaims $82k, 'up only' officially starts for some days.”
Too few calls yet: 2 checked, and we show a win rate from 5. Each call is checked against the price move over the next 24 hours.
Mood over 72 hours: bullish. Latest call: Bitcoin bullish, 2026-10-29.
Check against official sources (courts, regulators, sanctions): "No regulator actions". Details and links to the documents are on this page.
Checked every day on our own, without the author: sanctions lists and the Bank of Russia warning list, regulator and court decisions, media investigations, the coins they pushed and ads without a label. Every finding links to its source.
✓ OFAC SDN (US Treasury)✓ UN Security Council✓ EU financial sanctions✓ UK Sanctions List✓ Bank of Russia warning list
Price on the day of the post and now, from CoinGecko. Top-20 coins and stablecoins are left out. Each link opens the post.
“Reposting here the still active launch campaign of my deal with Bybit” post ↗
A promo post: a presale, a partner or referral link, a promo code, a giveaway for joining. A label: #ad, sponsored, "реклама", erid. Claude reads the posts; the quote is always from the post itself.
A name match on a sanctions list is shown only when the list details clearly point to this person. Courts and investigations are searched by Perplexity once a week; links come only from the search results. Found a mistake, or you are this author: [email protected].
Index: the share of Freekonomist readers who trust this person, out of everyone who voted. It is the readers' opinion, not a legal check and not the win rate.
We only look at official decisions: regulators (SEC, CFTC, FINRA, FCA, ASIC and others), courts, prosecutors and sanctions lists. Rumours and social-media "investigations" do not count.
No regulator actions checked October 31, 2026
Nothing found in official regulator, court or sanctions records.
The trust level does not depend on win rate. Found a mistake, or you are this person and want to reply: [email protected].
We do not advise anyone and do not promote anyone. We only show the numbers: raw, clean data. Numbers do not lie, unlike people.
The views belong to their authors; we quote their public posts with a link to the original and are not affiliated with these people. A past win rate does not guarantee future hits. This is not financial advice.