CTelegram · @CryptoFatherBitcoin · 281K subscribers · ~59K views a post
Anonymous author CryptoFather breaks down bitcoin and altcoins daily: levels and long/short scenarios.
The call comes from the author's Telegram post (with an exact quote) and is checked 24 hours after it is published.
🟡 TONCOIN (TON): есть ли шанс на разворот? TON продолжает находиться под давлением продавцов. После продолжительного снижения покупатели пытаются стабилизировать цену, но говорить о полноценном развороте пока рано. Разбираем ключевые уровни и возможные точки входа. 💰 Текущая це
In the post: “Лонг от поддержки (агрессивный вариант) Зона входа: $1,12–1,15”
Too few calls yet: 1 checked, and we show a win rate from 5. Each call is checked against the price move over the next 24 hours.
Mood over 72 hours: bullish. Latest call: Toncoin bullish, 2026-10-30.
We have not checked this author against official sources (courts, regulators, sanctions) yet. The win rate only shows how often calls and the market matched.
Checked every day on our own, without the author: sanctions lists, the Bank of Russia warning list and the Russian tax service register of disqualified persons, regulator and court decisions, media investigations, the coins they pushed and ads without a label. Every finding links to its source.
✓ OFAC SDN (US Treasury)✓ UN Security Council✓ EU financial sanctions✓ UK Sanctions List✓ Bank of Russia warning list✓ FNS Russia: disqualified persons
Compare their calls with the Perpetuas strategy: 20 trend checks a day on BTC, ETH and SOL, longs only, your money stays on your own exchange. No promise of profit: see the backtest and the live results.
A promo post: a presale, a partner or referral link, a promo code, a giveaway for joining. A label: #ad, sponsored, "реклама", erid. Claude reads the posts; the quote is always from the post itself.
A name match on a sanctions list is shown only when the list details clearly point to this person. Courts and investigations are searched by Perplexity once a week; links come only from the search results. Found a mistake, or you are this author: [email protected].
Index: the share of Freekonomist readers who trust this person, out of everyone who voted. It is the readers' opinion, not a legal check and not the win rate.
We only look at official decisions: regulators (SEC, CFTC, FINRA, FCA, ASIC and others), courts, prosecutors and sanctions lists. Rumours and social-media "investigations" do not count.
Not checked yet
The trust level does not depend on win rate. Found a mistake, or you are this person and want to reply: [email protected].
We do not advise anyone and do not promote anyone. We only show the numbers: raw, clean data. Numbers do not lie, unlike people.
The views belong to their authors; we quote their public posts with a link to the original and are not affiliated with these people. A past win rate does not guarantee future hits. This is not financial advice.