ООлег Артемьев
Telegram · @ne_investor · 182K subscribers · ~19K views a post
Oleg Artemyev's 'Lazy investor' channel about crypto, with trade ideas and paid courses.
What people say about Олег Артемьев
We list the channel so you know who you are trusting. Below are public complaints and exposés from other sites, each with a link. These are third-party claims, not court decisions.
⚠ Scam complaints 2 sources · checked October 31, 2026
- vc.ru (блог «Стоп Мошенник») · February 9, 2025
A vc.ru blog post says the channel's paid signals lead to losses, there is no proof of winning trades, most subscribers are bots, negative comments are deleted and course fees are not refunded. Its conclusion: the project 'looks more like a fraudulent scheme'. Source ↗ - Отзовик · 2025
Customer reviews of Oleg Artemyev's investment school on Otzovik call him a fraud. Source ↗
Are you the author and disagree? Send your reply to [email protected] and we will publish it here.
Latest calls and how they played out
The call comes from the author's Telegram post (with an exact quote) and is checked 24 hours after it is published.
Quick answers
How often is Олег Артемьев right about the market?
Too few calls yet: 0 checked, and we show a win rate from 5. Each call is checked against the price move over the next 24 hours.
What does Олег Артемьев think about the market now?
No market calls in the last 72 hours.
Can you trust Олег Артемьев?
There are public scam complaints and exposés about this author on other sites. We collected them with links on this page. They are third-party claims, not court decisions.
Can you trust them
Checked every day on our own, without the author: sanctions lists, the Bank of Russia warning list and the Russian tax service register of disqualified persons, regulator and court decisions, media investigations, the coins they pushed and ads without a label. Every finding links to its source.
✓ OFAC SDN (US Treasury)✓ UN Security Council✓ EU financial sanctions✓ UK Sanctions List✓ Bank of Russia warning list✓ FNS Russia: disqualified persons
Of the 5 coins they pushed, 3 are now in the red and 1 fell more than 50%
Price on the day of the post and now, from CoinGecko. Top-20 coins and stablecoins are left out. Each link opens the post.
Buying BTC on the same days would have done better
Typical result (median) across 5 coins, from the day of the post to today. BTC bought on the same days, from CoinGecko.
Put your favourite blogger's strategy to the test
Compare their calls with the Perpetuas strategy: 20 trend checks a day on BTC, ETH and SOL, longs only, your money stays on your own exchange. No promise of profit: see the backtest and the live results.
8 of 8 promo posts carry no ad label
“регистрируйтесь с реферальным кодом ARTEMYEV” post ↗
“Регистрируйтесь на Pionex” post ↗
“Регистрируйтесь по ссылке” post ↗
“Bybit - лучшие условия по торговле, копитрейдинг” post ↗
“Щедрые бонусы на Pionex” post ↗
A promo post: a presale, a partner or referral link, a promo code, a giveaway for joining. A label: #ad, sponsored, "реклама", erid. Claude reads the posts; the quote is always from the post itself.
A name match on a sanctions list is shown only when the list details clearly point to this person. Courts and investigations are searched by Perplexity once a week; links come only from the search results. Found a mistake, or you are this author: [email protected].
Do readers trust them
Index: the share of Freekonomist readers who trust this person, out of everyone who voted. It is the readers' opinion, not a legal check and not the win rate.
Trust level
We only look at official decisions: regulators (SEC, CFTC, FINRA, FCA, ASIC and others), courts, prosecutors and sanctions lists. Rumours and social-media "investigations" do not count.
⚠ Scam complaints checked October 31, 2026
Nothing found in official regulator, court or sanctions records.
The trust level does not depend on win rate. Found a mistake, or you are this person and want to reply: [email protected].
We do not advise anyone and do not promote anyone. We only show the numbers: raw, clean data. Numbers do not lie, unlike people.
The views belong to their authors; we quote their public posts with a link to the original and are not affiliated with these people. A past win rate does not guarantee future hits. This is not financial advice.